Sunday, March 27, 2016

j reacts to the racist primary modeling, again

i already debunked this kind of thinking. but, i'll do it again: specifically as it applies to west virginia and kentucky. this is a racist analysis, by npr. and it should be challenged. strenuously.

these are conservative, deep southeastern states. the white population in these states (and also in indiana, which was ignored) should be expected to behave the same way as the white populations in the similar states around them. tennessee. virginia. southern ohio, too. and, clinton carried the white population in these states by very large margins.

these are results from march 1.

arkansas: 80% white. 66% clinton.
tennessee: 67% white. 66% clinton.
texas: 46% white. 66% clinton.
virginia: 61% white. 64% clinton.

what you see when you look at those results is that support for clinton remains stable, while race fluctuates. what that means is that race is not a predictor variable. and that's a proof!

again: the media will not cease, nor will they desist. the media is racist. it is a part of their job to be racist. but they must be called out on it at every opportunity.

voters make decisions based on the content of their characters, not on the colour of their skins.

and, clinton should be expected to carry the white vote in kentucky, west virginia and indiana by significant to overwhelming margins.

http://www.npr.org/2016/03/27/472056754/despite-the-math-bernie-sanders-has-already-won